健康去哪儿
健趣网登录 关闭
还没有账号?立即注册

Optimizing Long-Term Outcomes for Winter Depression With CBT-SAD and Light Therapy

赞助:
合作者:
信息的提供 (责任方):
Kelly Rohan,University of Vermont
September 28, 2018
October 2, 2018
October 2, 2018
September 1, 2018
February 28, 2023   (主要结果测量的最终数据收集日期)
Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression—Seasonal Affective Disorder Version (SIGH-SAD)[ Time Frame: past 1 week ]
Semi-structured interview of depressive symptoms

Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II)[ Time Frame: past 2 weeks ]
self-report measure of depressive symptoms

与当前相同
  • [ Time Frame: ]
 
Optimizing Long-Term Outcomes for Winter Depression With CBT-SAD and Light Therapy
Optimizing Long-Term Outcomes for Winter Depression With CBT-SAD and Light Therapy: Confirming the Targets, Mechanisms, and Treatment Sequence

Major depression is a highly prevalent, chronic, and debilitating mental health problem with significant social cost that poses a tremendous economic burden. Winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a subtype of recurrent major depression that affects 5% of the population (14.5 million Americans), involving substantial depressive symptoms for about 5 months of each year during most years, beginning in young adulthood.

Winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is a subtype of recurrent depression involving major depressive episodes during the fall and/or winter months that remit each spring. The central public health challenge in the management of SAD is prevention of winter depression recurrences. This application focuses on two SAD treatments that each work for some patients: light therapy (LT) and a SAD-tailored group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-SAD). LT is the acute SAD treatment with the most substantial evidence to support its efficacy. Correction of circadian phase is LT's established target and mechanism. In our recently completed R01-level efficacy trial, post-treatment outcomes for CBT-SAD and LT were very similar, but CBT-SAD was associated with fewer depression recurrences over 2-year followup than LT (27.3% in CBT-SAD vs. 45.6% in LT). CBT-SAD engaged and altered a specific mechanism of action, seasonal beliefs, which improved at twice the rate during CBT-SAD compared to LT, and this improvement was associated with lower risk for recurrence following CBT-SAD. This confirmatory efficacy R01 will apply the experimental therapeutics approach to determine how each treatment works when it is effective and to identify the best candidates for each. We will ascertain whether theoretically-derived candidate biomarkers of each treatment's target and effect are prescriptive of better outcomes in that treatment vs. the other. Biomarkers of LT's target and effect include circadian phase angle difference (PAD) and the post-illumination pupil response (PIPR). Biomarkers of CBT-SAD's target and effect include pupil dilation and sustained gamma band EEG responses to seasonal words, which are hypothesized to reflect less engagement with seasonal stimuli following CBT-SAD and corroborate with the established target of seasonal beliefs. In addition to determining change mechanisms, we will test the efficacy of a "switch" decision rule upon recurrence to inform clinical decision-making in practice. We will randomize 160 adults with SAD to 6-weeks of CBT-SAD or LT in Winter 1; follow subjects in Winter 2; and, if a depression recurrence occurs, cross them over into the alternate treatment (i.e., switch from LT to CBT-SAD or CBT-SAD to LT). All subjects will be followed in Winter 3. Biomarker assessments will occur at pre-, mid-, and post-treatment in Winter 1, at Winter 2 followup (and again at mid-/post-treatment for those crossed-over), and at Winter 3 followup. Consistent with NIMH's priorities for demonstrating target engagement at the level of RDoC-relevant biomarkers, this work aims to confirm the targets and mechanisms of LT and CBT-SAD to maximize the impact of future dissemination efforts.
Interventional
Phase 2/Phase 3
分配: Randomized
干预模型: Parallel Assignment
干预模型描述: head-to-head RCT
盲法: Interventional
盲法描述:Outcomes are rated on a semi-structured interview by raters blind to treatment assignment.
主要目的: Treatment
  • Behavioral: Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT-SAD)
    12 group sessions over 6 weeks
  • Other: Light Therapy
    10,000-lux initiated at 30 min upon waking and adjusted per treatment algorithm, continuing for 6 weeks
  • Experimental: Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT-SAD)
    12 1.5-hour group sessions at a rate of 2 sessions per week over 8 weeks.
  • Active Comparator: Light Therapy
    6 weeks of daily light therapy at home, using a 10,000-lux light box beginning at 30 minutes upon waking, with dose subsequently adjusted per treatment algorithm.
 
Recruiting
160
与当前相同
February 28, 2023
February 28, 2023   (主要结果测量的最终数据收集日期)
Inclusion Criteria: - Principle DSM-5 diagnosis of Major Depression, Recurrent, with Seasonal Pattern. -Meet Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression—Seasonal Affective Disorder Version (SIGH-SAD) criteria for a current SAD episode (see below). - No use or stable use of antidepressants (i.e., a consistent dose of the same medication maintained for > 4 weeks with no plans to change). Exclusion Criteria: - Current or past light therapy or CBT for SAD. - Presence of a comorbid Axis I disorder that requires immediate treatment (i.e., bipolar disorder, psychotic disorders, substance use disorder). - Acute and serious suicidal intent. - Planned absences of >1 week from the area through March. - History of conditions that are known contra-indications to LT, including conditions associated with toxicity of bright light to the retina (i.e., macular degeneration or any retinopathy).
参与研究的性别: All
最小年龄:18 Years ,最大年龄:N/A  
没有
United States
 
Yes
研究美国FDA监管的药品: No
研究涉及美国FDA监管的设备产品: No
计划分享 IPD: Yes
Kelly Rohan,University of Vermont
University of Vermont
Principal Investigator: Kelly J Rohan, Ph.D. University of Vermont
University of Vermont
September 2018

ICMJE     国际医学期刊编辑委员会和 世界卫生组织 ICTRP 要求的元素
请使用微信扫码报名