The Effect of Experimentally Decreasing Sedentary Behaviour on Subjective Well-being
追踪信息 | |||
---|---|---|---|
首次提交日期 ICMJE | August 14, 2018 | ||
首次发布日期e ICMJE | October 3, 2018 | ||
最后更新发布日期 | October 3, 2018 | ||
预计研究开始日期 ICMJE | January 2019 | ||
预计主要完成日期 | December 2019 (主要结果测量的最终数据收集日期) | ||
目前主要观察指标 ICMJE |
Change from pre-randomization Subjective Well-Being (Affect) at 1-week post-intervention and 1-week follow-up[ Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week post-intervention, and 1-week follow-up ] Subjective Well-Being (specifically, affect) will be assessed through the Positive Affect & Negative Affect Scale (PANAS). The PANAS consists of a number of words that describe different feelings and emotions. Participants indicate the extent to which they feel a particular feeling and emotion over the past week, using a 5-point scale that ranges from 1 "very slightly or not at all" to 5 "extremely". An overall score for both positive and negative affect is calculated by summing up the points for those particular feelings/emotions (e.g., interested for positive affect, distressed for negative affect). Scores for positive affect can range from 10-50, with higher scores representing higher levels of positive affect. Scores for negative affect can range from 10-50, with lower scores representing lower levels of negative affect. Change from pre-randomization Subjective Well-Being (Life Satisfaction) at 1-week post-intervention and 1-week follow-up[ Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week post-intervention, and 1-week follow-up ] Subjective Well-Being (specifically, life satisfaction) will be assessed through the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS); a 5-item scale designed to measure global cognitive judgments of one's life satisfaction. Participants indicate how much they agree or disagree with each of the 5-items over the past week, using a 7-point scale that ranges from 7 "strongly agree" to 1 "strongly disagree". An overall score (from 5 to 35) is calculated through summing the responses to the 5-items. Recommended cutoffs for interpretation are: 5-9, extremely dissatisfied; 10-14, dissatisfied; 15-19, slightly dissatisfied; 20, neutral; 21-25, slightly satisfied; 26-30, satisfied; 31-35, very satisfied. Change from pre-randomization Subjective Well-Being (Eudaimonic Well-Being) at 1-week post-intervention and 1-week follow-up[ Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week post-intervention, and 1-week follow-up ] Subjective Well-Being (Eudaimonic Well-Being) will be assessed through the Subjective Vitality Scale (SVS); a 6- or 7-item scale that assesses the state of feeling alive and alert - to having energy available to the self. For the purposes of this study, the 6-item individual difference level version of the SVS will be utilized. Participants indicate the degree in which a statement/item is true in general in their life, ranging from 1 "not at all" to 7 "very true". An overall score is obtained by averaging the scores for each of the 6-items, with higher scores indicating a greater feeling of vitality. Change from pre-randomization Subjective Well-Being at 1-week post-intervention and 1-week follow-up[ Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week post-intervention, and 1-week follow-up ] Subjective Well-Being will be assessed through the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS). The WEMWBS consists of 14-items that assesses subjective well-being through both hedonic and eudaimonic dimensions of well-being. Participants select the option that best describes their experience with each of the 14-items over the last week (note: the original questionnaire assesses the last two weeks), using a 5-point scale that ranges from 1 "none of the time" to 5 "all of the time". A total score is calculated by summing the 14 individual statement scores. The minimum score is 14 and the maximum is 70, with higher scores indicating greater levels of subjective well-being. |
||
原始主要观察测量 ICMJE | 与当前相同 | ||
目前的二级观察 ICMJE |
|
||
描述性信息 | |||
简略标题 ICMJE | The Effect of Experimentally Decreasing Sedentary Behaviour on Subjective Well-being | ||
正式标题 ICMJE | The Effect of Experimentally Decreasing Sedentary Behaviour on Subjective Well-being | ||
简要概况 | This study will explore the causality between outcomes of subjective well-being and sedentary behavior, through experimentally decreasing the sedentary behavior levels of university students. Half of the eligible participants will receive a behavioral counseling intervention to increase non-sedentary behavior over one week, while the other half will receive no instructions. After one week, all participants will receive no instructions and continue to wear the inclinometer for another week. |
||
详细说明 | The relationship between subjective well-being (SWB) and sedentary behavior (SB) has been briefly explored. However, the causality of the relationship (i.e., do higher levels of SB cause changes in SWB, or vice-versa) has not been fully examined. Experimentally decreasing SB and observing the potential subsequent effect on SWB may help to determine the causation between SB and SWB. A sedentary sample of full-time university students attending Western University will be recruited. Upon obtaining consent, demographics will be taken. Sedentary behavior will be confirmed objectively through inclinometer wear for 1-week. Upon confirmation of sufficient sedentary time, participants will complete questionnaires assessing past-week: SWB, SB, physical activity, depression, and anxiety questionnaires. Participants will also be randomized to either a behavioral counseling intervention group, or a no-contact control group. Participants will then continue wearing the inclinometer for 1 week. After the intervention week, participants will complete the questionnaires again, after which all participants will be told to continue daily behavior, and wear the inclinometer for another week. Upon completion of this follow-up week, participants will complete questionnaires again. | ||
研究类型 ICMJE | Interventional | ||
研究阶段 | N/A | ||
研究设计 ICMJE | 分配: Randomized 干预模型: Parallel Assignment 干预模型描述: Upon obtaining consent, eligible participants will complete a week-long baseline period and then will be randomly assigned to either a 1-week intervention or control group, followed by a 1-week follow-up period. 盲法: Interventional 盲法描述:Study advertisements and information provided to participants will focus on non-specific behaviour change, in order to mask participants to the purpose of the study. 主要目的: Other |
||
适用条件 ICMJE | |||
干预项目 ICMJE |
|
||
研究工具 |
|
||
招募信息 | |||
招募状态 ICMJE | Not yet recruiting | ||
预计入组 ICMJE |
30 | ||
原始预计入组 ICMJE | 与当前相同 | ||
预计研究完成日期 | December 2019 | ||
预计主要完成日期 | December 2019 (主要结果测量的最终数据收集日期) | ||
合格标准 ICMJE | Inclusion Criteria: - 18 years of age or older - Full-time student attending Western University - Able to read and write in English - Self-reporting ≥7 hours of average daily sedentary time Exclusion Criteria: - Self-reporting a mental illness - Currently having a physical disability that would prevent walking | ||
性别 |
|
||
年龄 | 最小年龄:18 Years ,最大年龄:N/A | ||
接受健康的志愿者 | 没有 | ||
可入组国家 ICMJE | |||
管理信息 | 数据检测委员会 | No | |
研究涉及美国FDA监管的产品 |
研究美国FDA监管的药品: No 研究涉及美国FDA监管的设备产品: No |
||
IPD 共享声明 |
|
||
责任方 | , | ||
研究赞助商 ICMJE | Western University, Canada | ||
合作者 ICMJE | |||
研究员 ICMJE |
|
||
PRS 账户 | |||
验证日期 | July 2018 | ||
ICMJE 国际医学期刊编辑委员会和 世界卫生组织 ICTRP 要求的元素 |