健康去哪儿
健趣网登录 关闭
还没有账号?立即注册

The Surprise Study

Sponsor:
Collaborators:
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
September 25, 2018
October 5, 2018
October 5, 2018
November 1, 2018
July 1, 2019   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Probability estimate[ Time Frame: Participants will have up to 8 months (until the study closes) to provide an estimate for each vignette (n=20) ]
The continuous estimate of probability of dying within the next 12 months for the SQ (0-100%).

Same as current
  • The Surprise Question[ Time Frame: up to 8 months (until the study closes)Participants will have up to 8 months (until the study closes) to provide a response for each vignette (n=20) ]
    Dichotomous response to the SQ (Yes/No)
  • The alternative Surprise Question[ Time Frame: up to 8 months (until the study closes)Participants will have up to 8 months (until the study closes) to provide a response for each vignette (n=20) ]
    Dichotomous response to the alternative SQ (Yes/No)
  • Treatment options[ Time Frame: up to 8 months (until the study closes)Participants will have up to 8 months (until the study closes) to provide a response for each vignette (n=20) ]
    The options for the course of action selected by the participants in each vignette
 

The Surprise Study

An Online International Comparison of Thresholds for Triggering a Negative Response to the "Surprise Question"

This study investigates the use of the Surprise Question [SQ] (would you be surprised if this patient were to die in the next 12 months?) in routine practice. In particular, the study will investigate the consistency of the responses to the SQ and the relationship with the subsequent course of action decided upon.

Whilst the original use of the Surprise Question was to identify people who might be in the last year of life and benefit from palliative care, the prognostic capability of the Surprise Question has been shown to be variable. What is unclear, is the extent to which a doctor should be "surprised" before a patient is suitable for palliative care, how consistently doctors respond to this question, and how the subsequent treatment decision relates to the SQ response. The study will recruit 600 General Practitioners (GPs) from 6 participating countries (100 per country; UK, Germany, Switzerland, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands). Each participant will asked to complete a series of 20 hypothetical patient summaries in an online task.
Observational
Allocation:
Intervention Model:
Intervention Model Description:
Masking: Observational
Masking Description:
Primary Purpose:
  • Other: Online study
    20 hypothetical patient summaries
  • : General Practitioners
    Registered General Practitioners in one of the six participating countries.
 
Not yet recruiting
600
Same as current
July 1, 2019
July 1, 2019   (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Inclusion Criteria: - Registered General Practitioner in one of the six participating countries - Able to read and understand the language in which the questionnaire is presented to them Exclusion Criteria:
Sexes Eligible for Study: All
18 Years and older   (Adult, Older Adult)
No
 
 
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product: No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product: No
Plan to Share IPD: Undecided
University College, London
Principal Investigator: Patrick Stone, MA, MD, FRCP University College, London
October 2018

ICMJE     Data element required by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the World Health Organization ICTRP
请使用微信扫码报名